Tiger I (late version)
Mar 16, 2008
 

One of the most important tanks of WWII is the Tiger. It was the example of sheer power and the tank of one of the most remarkable aces of WWII - Michael Wittman.

With it's huge gun and sophisticated optics it could outgun anything available at that time. Penetrating it's armor was only possible with a few guns.

This was the tank that many feared in the battle field. However, agility was not one of it's attributes, but it is without a doubt one of the most remarkable and iconic tanks of WWII

The Dragon Kit

If you want to despair really fast, this is the kit you should build.

Don't get me wrong. Dragon makes the most accurate and precise kits in the market, but there area few drawbacks with all this accuracy.

The number of parts is enormous (660 to be precise) for 3 possible variants. The details that differentiate these 3 versions are minute in some cases, but all is there in the box to help you achieve a decent result.

The real problem is an instruction sheet crammed with information that is very easy to overlook. Some of the options can only be spotted if you read the instructions very very carefully.

The DS tracks that come with the kit and the most recent incarnation of vinyl tracks and I still don't like them at all. In this case they are a link too long and they have to be convinced to rest in the correct position. In a tank where the tracks had a characteristic sag, I decided to get a set of Friul tracks and forget the included DS ones.

A small photo etch fret includes parts for detailing, especially those needed to build 4 locks for the turret storage box (I really HATE to do those tiny locks). Fortunately there are parts for making 5 of them, when we just need 4.
Someone smart thought that some parts could just disappear during construction. Wise decision.

The barrel (I expected to have one in metal) is in plastic and quite good, but a metal piece would be much better. I really can't understand Dragon's policy. Sometimes the kit has metal barrel and link tracks, in other cases it has plastic barrel and DS tracks...

This kit needs Zimmerit. All of the versions that you can do from the box need it. But this was just before the Dragon Zimmerit kits. So, I had to get an excellent set from ATAK models. An added cost for a kit that is not cheap, but a much needed item if you want to do a correct model.

Building starts
16-02-2008

I started to build this kit the day I received the ATAK Zimmerit on the mail. I just wanted to try it. And I did the turret. The Zimm was glued with epoxy (15 minute) and I really liked the outcome.

But, it was the only thing I did. The turret lied on my table for more than 6 months. Last Saturday I decided it was better to build the kit than to put the turret on the box and wait for better days.

So I started to check the instruction sheet for possible variants and to establish a sequence of building.

It started by the wheels. A multitude of wheels.
This is going to be the first time I paint a tank with the wheels already glued in place, but in this case I have no other option and I hate it. The best part is that this version had steel wheels so I won't have to paint tires on them (I still have to find a better way to do the early variant I have on the stash).

The tracks were a pleasure to build. I never built a set of Friul tracks so fast in my life. Just a little more than one hour per side, and their final look is unbeatable. Real sag, and they fit perfectly on the sprocket.

By now all of the hull is done with all Zimm applied. I decided to use ciano for the remainder of the panels. It is much faster and the one I have gives me enough time for locating the panels in their correct position. I'm putting all the parts that I need to have in place for the first coat of primer.
Then some of them will be detached (exhaust guards) for weathering and detailing of the stacks. I just use a very tiny spot of glue and the parts are easy to detach.

   
   

 
   

 

Maybe it's just me, but...
23-02-2008

Ok, I officially dislike these overly complex kits. Why? Because it's useless. Does it make sense that you can detail the radiators in the engine bay and you don't have an engine to put in?

Does it make sense that these radiators and fans are not even close to the real air ducts that this tank had?

You guessed. The answer is no. Because I'm not going to display the interior and this model won't have any hatches open I decided to pass these supposed detail pieces in the interior.

I'm going to pass in detailing the turret interior. It makes no sense for me to spend hours and hours to detail something that in the end is blatantly simplified. I did an interior on the Hetzer but that interior was complete and very well detailed.

I guess it doesn't hurt to include the parts that we "should" put on the interior, but either Dragon includes a complete and detailed set of parts for this, or may just leave them out. This way it's a waste of plastic.
I have a reference book with excellent pictures of the engine bay and radiators and I just could not find a place where some of the parts included were similar with the real tank.

   
   

 
   
   

Ok, now I vented, let's move on.
The accuracy of the kit is outstanding in many ways. The parts fit is just equaled by Tamiya. The photos you see above show a model where neither the top deck and turret roof are glued. They fit so well that you can hardly see the gap. Truly amazing.
The exterior is second to none. Crisp detail and all the little things that distinguish the variants are there to be seen.

With a good paintjob, this will be a beautiful and very representative model of Germany's  excellence in tank design during WWII.

I'm now going to do my favorite part - painting. In a few days I'll have the pictures here so that you can judge if I messed real bad or not.

Pros

  • Stunning detail

  • 3 versions possible and plenty of little details that make it one of the most accurate replicas of this tank available in the market.

Cons

  • Confusing instruction sheet. They need to be studied with a lot of attention

  • Over engineered in some parts. A hatch lock with 3 parts???

  • No Zimmerit. This will set you back a few bucks making the kit a little more expensive than it should

  • No metal barrel. Although the plastic version is not bad.

  • DS tracks. Reincarnation of vinyl take two. In spite of the very good detail, they are a link to long and they need convincing to give them the sag this kit needs. Again, a set of Friul tracks will do the job but at the expense of your wallet.

What will be used in this kit

Friul Tracks (ATL-06)
ATAK Zimmerit for Late Tiger (Dragon)


Design history

Henschel & Sohn began development of the vehicle that would eventually become the Tiger I in January 1937 when the Waffenamt requested Henschel to develop a Durchbruchwagen (Breakthrough tank) in the 30 ton range. Only one prototype hull was ever built and it never was mounted with a turret. The Durchbruchwagen I general shape and suspension greatly resembled the Panzer III while the turret would have greatly resembled the early Panzer IV C turret with the short barreled 7.5cm L/24 cannon. Before Durchbruchwagen I was completed a new request was issued for a heavier 30 ton class vehicle with thicker armor.

This was Durchbruchwagen II which would have carried 50mm of frontal armor and mounted a Panzer IVC turret with the 7.5cm L/24 cannon. Overall weight would have been approximately 36 tons. Only one hull was ever built and a turret was not fitted. Development of this vehicle was dropped in Fall of 1938 in favor of the more advanced VK3001(H) and VK3601(H) designs. Both the Durchbruchwagen I and II prototype hulls were used as test vehicles till 1941.

On September 9th 1938 Henschel & Sohn received permission to continue development of a VK3001(H) medium tank and a VK3601(H) heavy tank. The VK3001(H) was intended to mount a 7.5cm L/24 low velocity infantry support gun, a 7.5cm L/40 dual purpose anti-tank gun, or a 10.5cm L/28 artillery piece in a Krupps turret. Overall weight was to be 33 tons. armor was designed to be 50mm on frontal surfaces and 30mm on the side surfaces. Only four prototype hulls were completed for testing. Two of these were used to create the 12.8cm Selbstfahrlafette L/61, also known as Sturer Emil.

The VK3601(H) was intended to weigh 40 tons, carry 100mm on front surfaces, 80mm on turret sides and 60mm on hull sides. The VK3601(H) was intended to carry a 7.5cm L/24, or a 7.5cm L/43, or a 7.5cm L/70, or a 12.8cm L/28 cannons in a Krupp's turret that looked very similar to an enlarged PzIVC turret. One prototype hull was built followed later by five more prototype hulls. The six turrets intended for the prototype hulls were never fitted and ended up being used as static defenses along the Atlantic Wall. Development of the VK3601(H) project was discontinued in early 1942 in favor of the VK4501 project.

German combat experience with the French Somua S35 cavalry tanks, Char B1 heavy tanks, and the Matilda I and Matilda II infantry tanks in June 1940 showed that the German Army's Panzer arm needed a heavier and better armed tank with better armor protection. Superior German tactics overcame the problems with the superior enemy armored units but the Germans did take notice.

On May 26th 1941, at an armaments meeting, Henschel and Porsche were asked to submit designs for a 45 ton heavy tank to be ready by June 1942. Porsche worked to submit a updated version of their VK3001(P) Leopard tank prototype while Henschel worked to develop an improved VK3601(H)tank. Henschel built two prototypes. A VK4501(H) H1 which used the 88mm L/56 cannon and a VK4501(H) H2 which used the 75mm L/70 cannon.

Unlike the Panther tank, the designs did not incorporate any of the innovations of the T-34: the width benefits of sloping armor were absent but the thickness and weight of the Tiger's armor made up for this.

On June 22nd, 1941 Germany launched Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union. The Germans were surprised to find themselves opposed by Soviet designs that completely outclassed anything they were currently fielding. These were the T-34 medium tank and the KV-1 heavy tank. The T34 was almost immune to everything but the 7.5cm L/46 PAK40 anti tank gun and the legendary 88 mm gun flak 18/36. Panzer III's with the 5cm L/60 and the 5 cm PaK 38 anti tank guns could penetrate the sides of a T-34 but had to be very close. The KV-1 was immune frontally to all but the 88mm FLAK 18/36.

The emergence of the Soviet T-34 was a great shock; according to Henschel designer Erwin Aders, "There was great consternation when it was discovered that the Soviet tanks were superior to anything available to the Heer". An immediate weight increase to 45 tons and an increase in gun caliber to 88 mm was ordered. The due date for new prototypes was set for 20 April 1942, Adolf Hitler's birthday.

Porsche and Henschel submitted prototype designs and they were compared at Rastenburg before Hitler. The Henschel design was accepted as the best overall design, especially because of the problem-burdened Porsche gasoline-electric power unit and its use of large quantities of copper, a strategic war material. Production of the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. E began in August 1942. Porsche, awaiting orders for his Tiger tank, had built 100 chassis with some of them used for his Tiger prototypes. After not winning the contract it was ordered to use these chassis for a new heavy assault gun/tank hunter. In Spring 1943 ninety-one hulls were converted into the Panzerjäger Tiger (P), also known as Ferdinand, and after Hitler's orders of 1 February and 27 February 1944, Elefant.

The Tiger was essentially still at the prototype stage when first hurried into service, and therefore changes both small and large were made throughout the production run. A redesigned turret with a lower, safer cupola was the most significant change. To cut costs, the submersion capability and an external air-filtration system were dropped.

Production history

Production of the Tiger I began in August 1942, and 1,355 were built by August 1944 when production ceased. Production started at a rate of 25 per month and peaked in April 1944 at 104 per month. Strength peaked at 671 on 1 July 1944. Generally speaking, it took about twice as long to build a PzKpfw VI than another German tank of the period. When the improved PzKw VI Ausf B Tiger II began production in January 1944, the Tiger I was soon phased out.

Combat history

Tigers were capable of destroying the American Sherman or British Churchill IV at ranges exceeding 1,600 m. In contrast, the Soviet T-34 equipped with the 76.2 mm gun could not penetrate the Tiger frontally at any range, but could achieve a side penetration at approximately 500 m firing the BR-350P APCR ammunition. The T34-85's 85 mm gun could penetrate the Tiger from the side at over 1,000 m. The IS-2's 122 mm gun could destroy the Tiger at ranges exceeding 1,000 m from any aspect.

The M4 Sherman's 75 mm gun could not penetrate the Tiger frontally at any range, and needed to be within 500 m to achieve a side penetration. The British 17-pounder as used on the Sherman Firefly, if firing its APDS round, could penetrate frontally at over 1,500 m. The US 76 mm gun, if firing the most common APCBC ammunition, could not penetrate the Tiger frontally at any range, and needed to be within 1,000 m to get a side kill. However, if the 76 mm was firing HVAP ammunition (usually in short supply), frontal penetrations were possible at 1,000 m.

As range decreases in combat, all guns can penetrate more armor (with the exception of HEAT ammunition, which was rare in WW2). The great penetrating power of the Tiger's gun meant that it could destroy many of its opponents at ranges at which they could not respond. In open terrain this was a major tactical advantage. Opposing tanks were often forced to make a flanking attack in order to kill a Tiger. American tank crews were told that the safest and surest way to kill a Tiger was "to get it by its ass"— that is, to maneuver behind it and hit it in the engine compartment, where the armor was thinnest.

The Tiger was first used in action in September 1942 near Leningrad. Under pressure from Hitler the tank was put into action months earlier than planned and many early models proved to be mechanically fragile. In its first action on 23 September 1942, many of the first Tigers broke down. Others were knocked out by dug-in Soviet anti-tank guns. One tank was captured largely intact, which gave the Soviets a chance to study the tank and prepare a response.

In the Tiger's first actions in North Africa, the tank was able to dominate Allied tanks in the wide-open terrain. However, mechanical failures meant that there were rarely more than a few in action. In a replay of the Leningrad experience, at least one Tiger was knocked out by towed British six-pounder antitank guns.

The tank's extreme weight limited the bridges it could cross and made drive - throughs of buildings, which may have had basements, risky. Another weakness was the slow traverse of the hydraulically-operated turret. The turret could also be traversed manually, but this option was rarely used, except probably for a fix of a few mils.

Early Tigers had a top speed of about 45kmh on optimal terrain; however this was not a speed recommended for normal operation, and indeed was discouraged in training. Crews were told to not break 2600RPM due to reliability problems of the early Maybach engines at their maximum 3000RPM output. Not long after, the Tiger's top speed was reduced to about 38kmh due to the installation of an engine governor, capping the RPM of the Maybach HL 230 (HL 210s were used on early models) at 2600RPM. Despite this speed being slower then that of contemporary medium tanks of the time, which averaged a top speed of about 45kmh, the speed of the Tiger was still very respectable for a tank of its size and weight, which was nearly twice that of a Sherman or T-34. The Tiger had reliability problems throughout its service life; Tiger units frequently entered combat under strength due to breakdowns. It was rare for any Tiger unit to complete a road march without losing vehicles due to breakdown. The tank also had poor radius of action (distance a combat vehicle can travel and return, in normal battle conditions, without refueling). Surprisingly, for such a heavy tank, the Tiger had a lower ground pressure bearing than many smaller tanks, the most notable exception being the Soviet T-34.

The Tiger's armor and firepower, however, were feared by all its opponents. In tactical defense, its poor mobility was less of an issue. Whereas Panthers were the more serious threat to Allied tanks, Tigers had a bigger psychological effect on opposing crews, causing a "Tiger phobia". Allied tankers would sometimes evade rather than confront a Tiger, even a tank that only looked like one, such as the Panzer IV with turret skirts applied. In the Normandy campaign, it could take four to five Shermans to knock out a single Tiger tank by maneuvering to its weaker flank or rear armor; the Soviet T-34s fared similarly against the German tanks, as had the German PzIII earlier against the Soviet heavy tanks. An accepted Allied tactic was to engage the Tiger as a group, one attracting the attention of the Tiger crew while the others attacked the sides or rear of the vehicle. Since the ammunition and fuel were stored in the sponsons, a side penetration often resulted in a kill. This was, however, a risky tactic, and often resulted in the loss of several Allied vehicles. It took a great deal of tactical skill to eliminate a Tiger.

Tigers were usually employed in separate heavy tank battalions (schwere-Panzer-Abteilung) under Army command. These battalions would be deployed to critical sectors, either for breakthrough operations or, more typically, counterattacks. A few favored divisions, such as the Grossdeutschland or some of the low-numbered Waffen-SS divisions had a handful of Tigers.

On 7 July 1943, a single Tiger tank commanded by SS-Oberscharführer Franz Staudegger from the 2nd Platoon of 13th Panzer Company of 1st SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler engaged a group of about 50 T-34s around Psyolknee (the southern sector of the German salient in the Battle of Kursk). Staudegger used all his ammunition in destroying 22 Soviet tanks, while the rest retreated. For this, Staudegger was awarded the Knight's Cross.

On 8 August 1944, a single Tiger commanded by SS-Unterscharführer Willi Fey from the 1st Company of sSSPzAbt 102, engaged a British tank column, destroying some 14 out of 15 Shermans, followed by one more later in the day using his last two rounds of ammunition. sSSPzAbt 102 lost all of its Tigers during fighting in Normandy, but reported 227 Allied tanks destroyed in six weeks.

The Tiger is particularly associated with the name of SS-Haupsturmführer Michael Wittmann of schwere SS-Panzerabteilung 101. He worked his way up, commanding various vehicles and finally a Tiger I. In the Battle of Villers-Bocage, he destroyed over two dozen Allied vehicles including several tanks; and single-handedly held up the advance of the entire 7th armored Division until his tank was knocked out and abandoned.

Over 10 Tiger tank commanders had over 100 tank kills on their account, including: Kurt Knispel with 168 kills, Otto Carius with 150+ kills, Johannes Bölter with 139+ kills, and Michael Wittmann with 138 kills.

Source : WikiPedia, Osprey

 

Service history
In service 1942–1945
Wars World War II
Production history
Designer Henschel & Son
Designed 1942
Produced 1942–1945
Number built 1,355
Specifications
Weight 56.9 tonnes
Length 8.45 m (gun forward)
Width 3.55 m
Height 3.0 m
Crew 5
Armor 25–110 mm
Primary armament 1× 8.8 cm KwK 36 L/56
92 rounds
Secondary armament 2× 7.92 mm
Maschinengewehr 34
4,800 rounds
Engine Maybach HL230 P45 (V-12 petrol) 700 PS (690.4 hp, 514.8 kW)
Power/weight 12.3 PS/tonne
Suspension torsion bar
Operational range 110-195 km
Speed 38 km/h


 

(471 visits)

pirespreto.com Site Map Pires Preto 1996 - 2006