Sd. Kfz. 123 (VK 1303)
Lynx
Apr 15, 2007

The Kit stash is getting bigger every week. I have enough kits
to build till retirement.
I've been paying attention to reviews, new releases etc etc, and
one company recently released a precious kit - A Sherman
Firefly. This company is Tasca, renown by the quality of it's
moulds and the finesse of detail. Unfortunately is also know by
the price of their kits, but no one is perfect.

The Luchs that they released in 2003 is an absolute beauty. I
dare to say that it's one of the most delicate works I've seen
in injected plastic. While waiting for the Sherman to be
available, I ordered one of these and in spite of the high price
I don't regret it a bit. The kit is outstanding.
Tasca includes a small fret of Photo Etch parts that I'll
complement with the set from Eduard.
The working suspension of the kit is only spoiled by the vinyl
tracks. However Modelkasten and Friul make a workable sets.
This time I'll go with the Friul option. The fragility of
Modelkasten tracks was fully evident on the Hetzer and I won't
go that route again. Metal is better hands down.
The kit looks very simple to assemble with much less fuss than
the current Dragon offerings but will produce an excellent
final result. After all the detail on the surface of the plastic
parts beats the Dragon offerings quite easily.
There are not many companies producing this kit in plastic, and
I saw a 1/48 version in resin in Steel Masters magazine. That's
what started it all. I loved that little tank and it's harmony.
Building starts
22-03-2007
This little tank was a surprise to me.
A little "Tiger" with
interleaved road wheels and nice proportions. Not very similar
with previous variants of the Pz. II that were more typical of
the period between WWI and WWII. This tank looked more modern,
agile and very appealing.
As I said before, after
reading one issue of a French magazine (Steel Masters) where
they featured the Luchs in 1/48 scale I decided to look for a
1/35 version hoping that Dragon had one.
I found the Tasca kits
(they have 2) and reluctantly decided to pay the high price
it had.
I did this after reading several positive reviews I found around
the Net. Everybody said that it was excellent but pricey. And both
things are true, but the quality is in fact awesome. I don't
regret the +50 Euros I spent on this kit.
The plastic is rigid to the exact amount of being able to have
excellent detail but not to the point that it's brittle. The
small parts that this has makes one wonder why PE is needed in
some cases.
The only thing I decided to change is the tracks. I've become a
fan of Friul metal tracks and that's what I'm going to use.
I'll be posting the build log and the reference pictures I can
find, with a nice selection already from the Steel Masters
magazine.
To the copyright police I inform that I have the magazine and I
have a subscription of both the regular monthly issues and the
by monthly Hors Serie issues.
I'm not going to put here the full image scanned pictures, but
at least you know where the references came from.

However, I found one thing that does not match with my
references. Tank 4121 from Abteilung 9, Normandy 1944 uses 3 colors
(Yellow, Green and Red Brown) but in this profile it has only 2.
I wonder if I can find why this discrepancy exists, but from
what I have, they are the very same tank. B&W photos are
inconclusive. I can't see if there are 1 or 2 colors on the
camouflage. I can see that it has soft edges but not the colors.
Oh well, I'll find that eventually.
Work in Progress
25-03-2007
The work is well under way. The lower hull and suspension is
almost complete. I was assembling the workable suspension and
thinking I had to glue everything in place.
However, it seems to hold quite well and the suspension works
perfectly. The detail is wonderful and all the parts fit like
a piece of clockwork. Truly amazing and a pleasure to build.
To test fit everything I had to assemble the tracks and I did
one in about two hours. I'm getting very experienced in
assembling these Friul tracks and I must say that they are way
better to assemble than those flimsy Modelkasten tracks. The
sag is "natural" because of their weight and they are sturdy
enough to handle.
If they were MK's I would had broken a couple of pins by now. Of
course, the detail is a bit rougher when compared with the MK's
but it's the only thing were they may loose. Not enough to
turn the table in favor of the plastic MK's.
The lower hull consists of 4 pieces. The bottom, the side
sections a plate in the front and a bigger one in the rear.
The assembly gives 0 problems and the final result is as good
as it can bee. I tried test fitting the upper section and all
seems perfectly aligned.
If this continues like this, I know which kit I'll build next.
The Tasca Firefly.
Detailing & Photo Etch
2-04-2007
This was one of my fastest builds till now. Probably because
the kit is so nice to build. I've never seen this kind of
detail in plastic. I even skipped a few photo etch parts
because the plastic parts are so good it seemed like a
sacrilege not to use them.
Look at the minute lifting hooks that have holes
in them. The quality of the molds must be amazing.
The Eduard set is very good and even shows a few corrections
to the Tasca instructions. The fire extinguisher the tools
(shovel and axe) are located in different positions than the
ones shown on the kit. An additional box over the left fender
was omitted on the kit, but Eduard provides a neat one to
build.
Some other parts I just didn't apply because it really didn't
make sense. The interior has a lot of detailing in PE but I'm
not going that route again. Unless I build an open model where
we can see the interior I'll never do what I did with the
Hetzer. A beautiful interior is
there never to be seen again after closing the tank. Talk
about wasting hours and hours of work.
From now on if I do any detail on the interior it has to be
seen.
I've tried the route of soldered photo etch and I'll never go
back again. The water jerry can supports are soldered and they
are very solid. Of course that I handle the kit with extreme
care but they are pretty solid when compared with my first
tries with ciano glued photo etch.
Some welded joints were recreated with thin plastic rod,
sanded almost flush with the surface and textured with an
Xacto blade. These weldings exist on the front corners of the
upper deck close to the front plate and on the front of the
turret.
My research found some photographs where these weldings are
clearly seen and they were missing on the kit for the simple
reason that is the place where two plastic parts are glued
together. I solved two problems in one go. Make the glued
joint disappear and at the same time add some accuracy to the
kit.
Painting
5-04-2007
I started the part I like the most - Painting. And I tried
something that was not very successful.
Pre shading in red. Why red? you may ask. Well, because
germans used a red primer before painting their tanks and I
guess it's the color of the primer they still use over steel.
I used LIfecolor Dunkelgelb (very good) to coat the tank after
the pre shade. And it was so diluted that I had some trouble
to get rid of the excessive reddish look of the tank.
That'll teach me to dilute less and to use black or dark grey
next time.
In the end the result is pretty good but from the pictures you
can hardly see the result. However, it's there and it's
noticeable. Pity that the camouflage will make it even less
noticeable.
The method works. That's a given. The way to do it may vary
with the base color, and I can't be 100% sure that we can see
the red in some places of the original tanks, but at least is
an option that I can defend.
n the last photo of this set you can see a darker tone close
to the fenders a some of it on the turret but to the eye the
effect is much more visible and quite good.
The camouflage consists of random stripes of green and brown
over the Dunkelgelb base.
Fairly easy to do if the airbrush is a decent one and if the
paint is correctly thinned.
I managed to do that with the Life Color paints I used for
this kit, and I must say that they seemed very easy to use and
very tolerant to the level of thinning I chose.
I was afraid that all the pre shading I had done would not be
visible at all and I was right. Kind of useless to do with a
heavily camouflaged tank.
I had to enhance the shadows and light points after painting
and I did it with oils.
The time it took to do this last phase was far more than the
time used on all the rest. In fact this is a crucial part of
the final product. The times is takes does not matter as long
as the model is OK.
I made a decision with this kit - I won't start any kit before
finishing completely the one I'm building. This helps to give
attention to all the details instead of letting kits almost
finished waiting for that day that never arrives.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Photos taken with Canon EOS
D60
and Speedlite 380 Flash
|
|
|
 |
|
The tracks were painted with Tamiya gun metal and them a mix
of pigments was applied diluted with water. The first was a
dark rust pigment to wok as a color foundation and a mix of
Europe earth with Russian earth. I did this because using
another combination was producing a very light dust color that
didn't give the pizzazz I was looking for.
The paint chipping in the places where I assume the paint
would be worn were done with a pencil and little spots of oil
and metallic Tamiya paints.
It's not easy to achieve a well balanced worn look and I
always do this very slowly because I've seen tanks that are so
miserably worn that no one would want to move around a battle
field in them.
I guess that they didn't last for a long time
after the invasion of Europe by the Allies. This tank took
part in the battle of Normandy, so I assume it had a short
life.
Well, here it is, I hope you like the final result. I like it
a lot ;)
What was used in this kit
Tasca Pz II Luchs (35-001)
Eduard PE Set (35637)
Friul Tracks (ATL-36)
LifeColor, Tamiya and Vallejo paints.
Photos taken with Canon EOS 60D and
Speedlite 380 Flash
|